From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:01:35 -0800 > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 08:31:00AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> My next move would be to add more debug to the CPU map setup and teardown, >> so that we can verify that the map that is being used above has indeed been >> setup. Unless Christoph has any ideas on what is going on here? > > No good idea, but I'd sugges to debug cpu_to_queue_index how it could > return such an out of bounds value. I would suggest looking into the possibility that we allocate the memory using the count of valid cpus, rather than the largest cpu number. That's a common error that runs into problems with discontiguous cpu numbering like Sparc sometimes has. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
