Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 02:23:35PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:59:07 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> > I don't want to define the array size of the fpregs save area
> > explicitly and thereby placing an artificial limit there.
> 
> Nevermind, it seems we have a hard limit of 7 FPU save areas anyways.
> 
> Meelis, please try this patch:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> index f85dc85..cc6275c 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ struct thread_info {
>  	struct pt_regs		*kern_una_regs;
>  	unsigned int		kern_una_insn;
>  
> -	unsigned long		fpregs[0] __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
> +	unsigned long		fpregs[(7 * 256) / sizeof(unsigned long)]

This part:

> +		__attribute__ ((aligned(64)));

Could be written as __aligned(64)

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux