Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:59:07 -0400 (EDT)

> I don't want to define the array size of the fpregs save area
> explicitly and thereby placing an artificial limit there.

Nevermind, it seems we have a hard limit of 7 FPU save areas anyways.

Meelis, please try this patch:

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
index f85dc85..cc6275c 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ struct thread_info {
 	struct pt_regs		*kern_una_regs;
 	unsigned int		kern_una_insn;
 
-	unsigned long		fpregs[0] __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
+	unsigned long		fpregs[(7 * 256) / sizeof(unsigned long)]
+		__attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
 };
 
 #endif /* !(__ASSEMBLY__) */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux