David Miller wrote: [Fri Sep 20 2013, 12:01:42PM EDT] > From: Bob Picco <bpicco@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:32:18 -0400 > > > This UltraSPARC - older sparc64 - issue will arise in other work that is > > engaged. Would you be willing to suggest an UltraSPARC System which would > > cover most issues? My desire is to avoid burdening you with my future > > efforts. > > I even don't have all UltraSPARC variants available to me at one time, > you're going to have to cover UltraSPARC-I/II, III, T1/T2, T3, T4, and > T5. A ticket has been filed for this hardware. Most Niagara we have with Linux installed. It is the UltraSPARC I/II, III where we are deficient. > > It's not a burdon for me to take care of this, I know what all of the > limitations and parameters are of all of these chips, and I should be > the one doing this kind of core infrastructure work anyways. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
