Hi, David Miller wrote: [Wed Sep 18 2013, 06:32:08PM EDT] > From: Bob Picco <bpicco@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:59:59 -0400 > > > To Summarize: > > 1) Dynamically patch PAGE_OFFSET. > > 2) Remain at three level page table. > > . So effectively remain at a single binary for sparc64 without the aid of > > a config option. Do I have this correct? > > I don't think remaining at a three level page table for 48 bit > physical addresses is feasible. > > Let's start one thing at a time, namely dynamic PAGE_OFFSET. I'm > working on that right now. This UltraSPARC - older sparc64 - issue will arise in other work that is engaged. Would you be willing to suggest an UltraSPARC System which would cover most issues? My desire is to avoid burdening you with my future efforts. I have this recommendation: http://www.berkcom.com/ for refurbished equipment. This would be for home office computer rack. thanx, bob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
