Hi David, On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:16 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:07:34 +1000 > >> Would it be possible to hide sun4c away behind a kconfig variable >> that is marked as BROKEN with a entry in the feature-removal file? >> >> Or is that just too much work for code which has been broken for a long time. > > We just want to kill all of this code off, there is zero value keeping > it around at all. > > It's in the revision history if you just want to look at it, and > nobody is going to make changes that try to keep it working so letting > this stuff linger has zero value. I figured that would be the consensus. I have no objection to annihilating the code - I just don't like seeing code being thrown away. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
