Hi Sam, On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 06:21:04PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Also considering that sun4c support has been broken for > some time and there is a few changes pending where sun4c > does not make things simpler we will drop sun4c support. > > I already took a quick look at it and in the process > I think I uncovered a bug in NMI handling for sun4m > in UP mode. We would call the sun4c nmi trap despite > being a sun4m box - this would not go well. > > When I have something tested I will forward my > patches. Would it be possible to hide sun4c away behind a kconfig variable that is marked as BROKEN with a entry in the feature-removal file? Or is that just too much work for code which has been broken for a long time. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
