On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:11:58PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 04/12/2012 03:26 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:59:57PM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:32 -0400, David Miller wrote: > >>> From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:48:35 +0400 > >>> > >>>> So I want to ask people who know sparc64 deeply. Are there any > >>>> architecture limits which make hibernation on v9 impossible? May be > >>>> anybody has researched this question. > >>> > >>> I can't think of any sparc64 hardware which would support hibernation > >>> in any reasonable way, so I'm quite surprised that you plan on > >>> implementing support for it. Perhaps you can elaborate your plans :-) > >> > >> http://www.rugged-systems.com/p/mobilesunsolaris/0075.htm is a sparc64 > >> laptop :) > > > > I'm actually tempeted by this: > > http://www.ebay.de/itm/Tadpole-SparcBook-s3-GX-32-mb-no-HD-or-Battery-3GX-free-shipping-/390406182711?pt=DE_Technik_Computer_Peripherieger%C3%A4te_PC_Systeme&hash=item5ae6059737#ht_3226wt_1064 > > > > But I could also wait until someone donate me a not-so-power hungry sparc64 box. > > I actually have one of those Tadpoles. Not sparc64. Worked last time I > poked it, except for the video chipset and the PCMCIA. Whenever you have some time I would be glad if you could test a sparc32 kernel. sparc32 (for obvious reasons) does not see much test-coverage - so a little more would be a great help to keep the sparc32 port alive. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
