On 04/12/2012 03:26 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:59:57PM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:32 -0400, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:48:35 +0400 >>> >>>> So I want to ask people who know sparc64 deeply. Are there any >>>> architecture limits which make hibernation on v9 impossible? May be >>>> anybody has researched this question. >>> >>> I can't think of any sparc64 hardware which would support hibernation >>> in any reasonable way, so I'm quite surprised that you plan on >>> implementing support for it. Perhaps you can elaborate your plans :-) >> >> http://www.rugged-systems.com/p/mobilesunsolaris/0075.htm is a sparc64 >> laptop :) > > I'm actually tempeted by this: > http://www.ebay.de/itm/Tadpole-SparcBook-s3-GX-32-mb-no-HD-or-Battery-3GX-free-shipping-/390406182711?pt=DE_Technik_Computer_Peripherieger%C3%A4te_PC_Systeme&hash=item5ae6059737#ht_3226wt_1064 > > But I could also wait until someone donate me a not-so-power hungry sparc64 box. I actually have one of those Tadpoles. Not sparc64. Worked last time I poked it, except for the video chipset and the PCMCIA. ~tom == Fedora Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
