On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 18:05 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:44:26 -0500 (EST) > > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:14:12 +0100 > > > >> The only thing resting me is asking you to simply test the below patch > >> and report what happens. Hopefully things will simply work.. if not I've > >> messed up and need to go look harder :/ > > > > I'll give it a spin, and get back to you, thanks! > > Ok, so far so good, I stressed out my Niagara-T3 box for a while doing gcc > bootstraps, running the testsuite, etc. and all seems well so far. > > I'll keep beating on it and let you know if anything funny happens, but for > now as far as I'm concerned: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks David!! I'll probably post again (and propose merger) once Catalin's patches that remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW from ARM have landed. ARM being the last user of that feature, and with only SPARC64 and IA64 (needlessly) using __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW we could finally remove some of that hairy code from the core scheduler. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
