Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Make SA_NOMASK a synonym of SA_NODEFER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/21, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> Unlike other architectures, sparc currently has no SA_NODEFER
> definition but only the older SA_NOMASK. Since SA_NOMASK is the
> historical name for SA_NODEFER, add SA_NODEFER and copy what other
> architectures do by making SA_NOMASK a synonym for SA_NODEFER.

Without this patch arch/sparc can't use the new helper from 2/2

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
> index e49b828..aa42fe3 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
> @@ -143,10 +143,11 @@ struct sigstack {
>  #define SA_ONSTACK	_SV_SSTACK
>  #define SA_RESTART	_SV_INTR
>  #define SA_ONESHOT	_SV_RESET
> -#define SA_NOMASK	0x20u
> +#define SA_NODEFER	0x20u
>  #define SA_NOCLDWAIT    0x100u
>  #define SA_SIGINFO      0x200u
>  
> +#define SA_NOMASK	SA_NODEFER
>  
>  #define SIG_BLOCK          0x01	/* for blocking signals */
>  #define SIG_UNBLOCK        0x02	/* for unblocking signals */
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux