Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:06:12 +0200
Hello Dave,
All the changes in this patch set [1..7] must be applied on top
of Sam genirq patch. The are all LEON specific.
They add:
* mask/unmask spinlock protection
* Support for LEON Extended IRQ controller
* Use new genirq layer for per-cpu Timer ISR (cleanup)
* other cleanups
* add support for CPU affinity
Daniel Hellstrom
Hey Daniel, could you please address Sam's feedback on a few patches
and then resubmit this? You can integrate the ACK's he gave for
some of the patches when you do that.
It became a bit more messy than my intension... I have added Sam's
boot_cpu_id patch in front of my patches, and previous patch 6 (now 7)
has been swapped with previous patch 7 (now 8). I have added Sam's
ACK. The previous patch 6 which I was supposed to drop have now been
cleaned up using Sam's boot_cpu_id instead of a LEON specific variable
leon3_boot_cpu.
I'm sorry to mess up stuff even more, the patches 1 and 8 in my series
does not compile on UP since setup.h isn't included. But even worse is
that the boot_cpu_id is always 0 it seems because it is initialized
before BSS is cleared, and boot_cpu_id is part of BSS.
Please apply patches [2/8]..[7/8], and drop [1/8] and [8/8]. It is
better we do it the way you proposed (drop boot_cpu patch). I'm sorry
that I ever brought up the boot_cpu_id stuff, as that had nothing to do
with the genirq patches, and I'm sorry for taking your time like this.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
