From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:20:53 -0500 > Now what I'm discussing with David Miller is if creating a > > __long_packed_aligned > > and using it for *both* type and variable alignment would be more palatable (it > also works, and is more compact). As I mentioned in another reply, we should not be using packed. Packed has other implications, which makes it use byte-at-a-time accesses for all parts of a structure when you tag it with 'packed'. GCC doesn't try to be clever and see that actually such accesses are safe. If plain "__long_aligned" works and, since you're tagging it to the structure definition, it only specifies a minimum-alignment, then I'm fine with using that to fix this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
