On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:15 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > After applying David's "remove align" patch, I got it to boot on x86_64 > > with the following two patches. I thought just adding the "align" to the > > structure declaration would work, but it still failed on the syscall for > > init_module. By removing the double "declaration" of event_exit_##sname, > > removed this problem. > > > > I'll test this on x86 32bit and PPC 64. If it works there, I'll push all > > of them out for 38. Should these go to 37 stable too? > > Please hold before adding these patches into git. They don't seem to address the > underlying problem correctly. See the latest exchanges between David Miller and > myself for more info. > > We need to come up with something better than "it boots" as an explanation for > the fix. Yes, I agree that we should solve this issue correctly. But if there is a work around to the problem, we could implement that if the real solution is not in our grasp yet. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
