Re: R_SPARC_13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Richard Mortimer <richm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:23:14 +0000

> To close this off as a non-issue as far as my boot failures are
> concerned I did some further checking and objdump is displaying
> R_SPARC_OLO10 as two separate entries. I checked the scsi_mod.ko binary
> and found the appropriate Elf64_Rela entry. That has 0x21 as the LSB of
> r_info and that is the proper code for R_SPARC_OLO10 which is what you
> expected in the first place!

Thanks for figuring this out Richard.

I'll look into fixing binutils so that it properly reports the
correct R_SPARC_OLO10 relocation in dumps.  There really is no
excuse for what it's currently doing.  In fact, I think this
quirk has sent me on wild goose chases in the past.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux