On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:48 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:42:20 -0600 > >> It protects against some later include file doing a #define >> of_node_to_nid and thus resulting in an inconsistent definition. If >> some code tries to do this then the preprocessor will complain. This >> is the pattern that Stephen suggested. > > Also, it would be nice to unravel the "0" vs. "-1" default > inconsistency. Indeed. I looked at it briefly, but it wasn't immediately clear what the impact would be to switch powerpc over to -1, and it looked to me like sparc depends on -1 to signify no node association. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
