From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:42:20 -0600 > It protects against some later include file doing a #define > of_node_to_nid and thus resulting in an inconsistent definition. If > some code tries to do this then the preprocessor will complain. This > is the pattern that Stephen suggested. Also, it would be nice to unravel the "0" vs. "-1" default inconsistency. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
