On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 01:15:55AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:56:13 -0700 (PDT) > > > Another idea is to decrement the ->disabled counter after the > > local_irq_restore(). Yes, we might lose IRQ handler traces which > > occur between the local_irq_restore() and the counter decrment, but we > > would also be completely immune to recursion problems. > > So I just gave this a try and I still get the crashes I've > been seeing with the non-graph function tracer, oh well :-) Are you using the pause_graph_tracing() thing on the function tracer? If so it won't work as it only applies to the function graph tracer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
