From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:56:13 -0700 (PDT) > Another idea is to decrement the ->disabled counter after the > local_irq_restore(). Yes, we might lose IRQ handler traces which > occur between the local_irq_restore() and the counter decrment, but we > would also be completely immune to recursion problems. So I just gave this a try and I still get the crashes I've been seeing with the non-graph function tracer, oh well :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
