Re: [PATCH 7/7] sparc64: Add function graph tracer support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:59:25 +0200

> This could be also a tracing recursion somewhere.
> One good way to know is to put pause_graph_tracing()
> and unpause_graph_tracing() in the very beginning and
> end of the tracing paths.
> 
> /me goes to try this.

Last night I still couldn't get the stack overflow checks to trigger,
even once i accounted for dynamic ftrace patchin, unfortunately.

But...

I added a tracing_off() call to the hrtimer deadlock avoidance case
and the machine doesn't crash after that triggers.

So I went to look at the per-cpu trace of the processor on which
the hrtimer deadlock avoidance triggered, and it has a looping
sequence of timestamps which looks really strange.  The other
per-cpu traces look just fine.

This is a major clue I think, so I'll keep snooping around trying
to dig more deeply into this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux