From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:14:12 +0200 > Hmm, just a random idea: do you think it could be due to stack overflows? > Because the function graph eats more stack by digging to function graph > handlers, ring buffer, etc... > > It diggs further than what is supposed to happen without tracing. I have mcount checking for stack-overflow by hand in assembler during these tests, it even knows about the irq stacks. And those checks are not triggering. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
