From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:55:29 +0100 (CET) > On Wednesday 2009-12-02 23:57, David Miller wrote: >>The T1 cores are repesented as SMT units. > > It seems so. > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/ > cpu0/topology/physical_package_id:0 > cpu1/topology/physical_package_id:0 > cpu10/topology/physical_package_id:2 > cpu11/topology/physical_package_id:2 > cpu12/topology/physical_package_id:3 > cpu13/topology/physical_package_id:3 > cpu14/topology/physical_package_id:3 > cpu15/topology/physical_package_id:3 > cpu16/topology/physical_package_id:4 > ... > > Why is this done, when they are, in fact, not multiple physical > packages? Because I need two levels of grouping to represent chips like T2. I use SMT to represent the cores. And I use MC to represent the 2 integer units within a core on T2. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
