Re: No MC sched domains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2009-12-02 23:57, David Miller wrote:
>
>> the T1 is said to be multi-core, however, I am not seeing any MC sched 
>> levels in dmesg as I do on x86. Why is that?
>
>The T1 cores are repesented as SMT units.

It seems so.

/sys/devices/system/cpu/
cpu0/topology/physical_package_id:0
cpu1/topology/physical_package_id:0
cpu10/topology/physical_package_id:2
cpu11/topology/physical_package_id:2
cpu12/topology/physical_package_id:3
cpu13/topology/physical_package_id:3
cpu14/topology/physical_package_id:3
cpu15/topology/physical_package_id:3
cpu16/topology/physical_package_id:4
...

Why is this done, when they are, in fact, not multiple physical 
packages?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux