* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:50:08 +1100 > > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:31:03 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I'm surprised linux-next builds didn't catch this. > > > > So am I. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/compiler/5/ shows my latest > > builds of both linux-next and Linus' tree are OK for defconfig and > > allnoconfig (allmodconfig fails for a different reason). > > > > What is different about the failing config (compiler)? Are there other > > configs it would be sensible to build test? > > Maybe you don't have NUMA enabled in the test build configs. > I hit it during an allmodconfig. > > Anyways this fixes it, someone please apply: > > sparc64: Fix cpumask related build failure. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> applied it to tip/core/urgent and will send it to Linus later today. Thanks David! Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html