From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:50:08 +1100 > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:31:03 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm surprised linux-next builds didn't catch this. > > So am I. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/compiler/5/ shows my latest > builds of both linux-next and Linus' tree are OK for defconfig and > allnoconfig (allmodconfig fails for a different reason). > > What is different about the failing config (compiler)? Are there other > configs it would be sensible to build test? Maybe you don't have NUMA enabled in the test build configs. I hit it during an allmodconfig. Anyways this fixes it, someone please apply: sparc64: Fix cpumask related build failure. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h index b8a65b6..5bc0b8f 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *pbus) (pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ? \ CPU_MASK_ALL : \ node_to_cpumask(pcibus_to_node(bus))) +#define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus) \ + (pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ? \ + CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR : \ + cpumask_of_node(pcibus_to_node(bus))) #define SD_NODE_INIT (struct sched_domain) { \ .min_interval = 8, \ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
