Re: Dropping sparc32 for lenny

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 27 2007 19:15, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
>Tried to run OpenOffice on a sparc32 with maximum of 512 MByte of memory?
>[...]
>I was not saying to DROP sparc32, but exclude some heavy applications
>which make definitivly no sens on such Computers...
>[...]
>So, I think, some $ARCH should loss weight.

If you already ask that way, I suppose the answer would be "you
should not". These applications should be fixed. Something _ought_ to
be wrong (no advertising intended although I can't help it if it
does) if Softmaker Office, directly after start with a blank new
document, uses less than 10 MB of RSS (i386) when OpenOffice is
already at no less than 80 (and if it's just a ton of shared
libraries). I think some $PROGs should lose weight first, then
perhaps they do not even need to be dropped.

And now note that I do not have a sparc32, so I can't quite compare,
but I know what pain sparc32 owners are in, because they usually got
less memory than most 'small' (understatement for 'a lot of weight')
sparc64 servers (thinking of E250).

I guess that was a bit offtopic now.


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux