Re: [PATCH] sunlance probing problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia 12-08-2006 o godz. 1:11 Eric Brower napisał(a):
> The "le" is not always a child of lebuffer or ledma.  Attached is
> output from an SS2, where le hangs directly off sbus.  Granted,
this
> is an older "le" implementation.
> 

Thank you for the hint. This is a corrected patch which checks if
the "le" is child of ledma or lebuffer.

From: Krzysztof Helt (krzysztof.h1@xxxxx)

The patch skips probing of the "le" device if it is a child of
"ledma" or "lebuffer".

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt (krzysztof.h1@xxxxx)
---
I tested it on SS20 and 2.6.18-rc4 kernel.


----------------------------------------------------
Czy 10 minut rozmowy = ponad 11 zł oszczędności ?
Sprawdź: http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=http%3A%2F%2Ftelefon.wp.pl%2Foszczednosci.html&sid=842

Attachment: lance-id.patch
Description: Binary data


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux