David Miller napsal(a):
Can you guys give this patch a spin? I think this might
cure it. Please be sure to add this patch to a kernel
you know produced the symptoms before.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/lib/U1memcpy.S b/arch/sparc64/lib/U1memcpy.S
index bafd2fc..7293020 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/lib/U1memcpy.S
+++ b/arch/sparc64/lib/U1memcpy.S
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
EX_ST(STORE_BLK(%fsrc, %dest)); \
add %dest, 0x40, %dest; \
ba,pt %xcc, target; \
- nop;
+ DO_SYNC
#define FINISH_VISCHUNK(dest, f0, f1, left) \
subcc %left, 8, %left;\
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I test it on my E250 with debian sid and 2.6.17-rc4. With 2.6.16.16 no
problem with status database. I switch to 2.6.17-rc4 install some
package and DB is corrupted. Reboot to 2.6.16.16 and all works. I
applied your patch and situation is the same as without patch still db
corruption.
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
