Powered by Linux
Re: %p extension checking — Semantic Matching Tool

Re: %p extension checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:52:49PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> 
> > Is this less spammy than gcc's -Wformat-security?
>

I feel like eventually we will be able to do stuff like verify the
caller data which GCC can't do.

> Not really, but maybe a little: gcc doesn't seem to do type checking if
> the argument is const char*const, only if it is const char[]. I've
> finally gotten around to supporting both.
> 
> Dan, please see if you can merge the last few patches.

Sure.  Done.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe smatch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux