On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 10:38:50AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:04 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Smatch still produces a lot of false positives. Also as bugs get > > fixed in the kernel, the false positive to real bug ratio gets > > worse and worse. But it does find real bugs as well. > > Perhaps a database of known false positives and a mechanism > to use it to see only new instances could be created. What I do is only look at new bugs. I've got a script smatch_scripts/new_bugs.sh That takes the output from two smatch runs and prints the bugs which are new. Artem has a set of scripts he's working on as well. regards, dan carpenter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature