5 okt 2011 kl. 16:04 skrev Vijay K. Gurbani: > On 2011/10/3 Olle E. Johansson<oej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The clause about a dual-stack user agent clearly doesn't follow RFC >> 3263, since it implies "and" instead of "or". There's no MUST, SHOULD >> or MAY language applied here, so it seems like this is an oversight - >> not that RFC 6157 is wrong, but that there should have been a more >> clear update to RFC 3263. > > Interesting reading of the tea leaves. Just noted that MSRP has the same issue. Growing to a tea bush :-) > > One thing you may want to do is to file an errata (see "How to Report > Errata" at http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html). > > Then, the authors and any verifying parties will deliberate on whether > or not this is indeed an errata. This appears to work for errata in > text, but your claim is that rfc6157 should have updated rfc3263 as > well, so the change is in the masthead of rfc6157 and not in the text > itself. > > I suspect that a decision will be made on what to do after an errata > is filed ... > Ok, will do. /O _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
