On 2011/10/3 Olle E. Johansson<oej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The clause about a dual-stack user agent clearly doesn't follow RFC 3263, since it implies "and" instead of "or". There's no MUST, SHOULD or MAY language applied here, so it seems like this is an oversight - not that RFC 6157 is wrong, but that there should have been a more clear update to RFC 3263.
Interesting reading of the tea leaves. One thing you may want to do is to file an errata (see "How to Report Errata" at http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html). Then, the authors and any verifying parties will deliberate on whether or not this is indeed an errata. This appears to work for errata in text, but your claim is that rfc6157 should have updated rfc3263 as well, so the change is in the masthead of rfc6157 and not in the text itself. I suspect that a decision will be made on what to do after an errata is filed ... Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
