Christer,
Certainly there is no problem with continuing to discuss that.
But I didn't see any reason to mention it in this draft any longer.
Thanks,
Paul
Christer Holmberg wrote:
Hi,
The rejecting PRACK offer is still "ongoing", but unfortuantely I have not had time to do much onit lately - mostly due to INFO.
Regards,
Christer
________________________________________
From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx [sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat [pkyzivat@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 7:48 PM
To: sipping-chairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: sipping
Subject: [Sipping] New version posted: draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-11.txt
I just posted a new version of the offeranswer draft.
This version is intended to resolve all outstanding issues.
Here is a summary of substantial changes made:
- the open issues that were previously in section 6 were
removed. The doc has been updated as needed to be consistent
with conclusions about how to deal with those issues.
Specifically:
- Rejecting PRACK offer has simply been dropped.
There has been no ongoing interest in no normative work
to support doing that.
- Commit/Rollback of Offer/Answer on Unsuccessful re-INVITE
Transaction has been resolved by reference to
draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite-01. New text referencing
that has been added at multiple places in the document.
- Loosening requirement for Offer in a Reliable Response:
Again there has been no indication of intent to do anything
in this space, so the topic has simply been dropped.
- Requesting Hold while already on Hold:
This was already addressed in the main body of the document.
The issue was whether this was appropriate, since it rests on
the interpretation of certain text in 3261 being non-normative.
That assumption has been restated in the main body.
I'm unaware of any argument to that in over two years.
- The recommendations for addition of new o/a usage in sip
(prior section 7) has also been dropped. While these may have
been helpful during discussion of the draft, they aren't
helpful after it is finalized.
- I rearranged the order of authors since Takuya has been unavailable
to work on it for some time. However I have retained him as an author
because the preponderance of the text is still his.
In addition there hare assorted miscellaneous minor cleanups.
Thanks,
Paul
Internet-Draft@xxxxxxxx wrote:
New version (-11) has been submitted for draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-11.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-11.txt
Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
Diff from previous version:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-11
IETF Secretariat.
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
