On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:10 +0100, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> In my working copy I have added this to the string in front of the urn
> definition itself, rather than in 4.1. and 4.2.
>
> Service-ID = "urn:urn-7:" urn-service-id
> urn-service-id = top-level *("." sub-service-id)
> top-level = let-dig [ *26let-dig ]
> sub-service-id = let-dig [ *let-dig ]
> let-dig = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-"
Maybe I've missed some discussion, but I don't quite understand the
second component proposed for the URNs. In -02, it is shown as
"urn-xxx" (with the initial scheme "urn" omitted, which you have since
fixed). In your message that I am replying to, it is shown as "urn-7",
which seems to be part of a series "urn-N" for defining URNs for local
use.
But given that 3GPP is interested in this, don't they already have a URN
namespace selected?
Dale
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
