OK. Then there is no definition of "in use" at all.
| Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009-02-27 16:08 |
|
Hi,
> Current definition of "in use" is the one proposed by Holmberg yesterday:
no, we are discussing the proposal in my original email. As I have said
before, the idea is to have focused discussions without jumping from
topic to topic before resolving any of them.
In any case, so far we have not found any requirement that would not be
met by the straw-man proposal in my original email. If we do not find
any soon, we will be making a decision shortly.
Cheers,
Gonzalo
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
_______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
