I'm not an IPR lawyer, so I don't pretend to understand the various
issues surrounding the RFC 5378 brouhaha. However, it has been brought
to my attention that my position as author of RFC 3265 may necessitate
some action on my part, since it contains text intended to be
incorporated into other documents (section 4.4 and its subsections).
To remove ambiguity, I am using this email to make a public statement
regarding any rights I may have in RFC 3265 as they relate to the IETF's
intellectual property policies:
As the author of RFC 3265, I hereby grant all Necessary Rights in
that document that I may legally grant to the IETF Trust. For the
purpose of this statement, the term "Necessary Rights" is defined as
the rights enumerated in section 5.3 of RFC 5378.
In the interest of full disclosure: I developed RFC 3265 as an employee
of Ericsson Inc. and, later, dynamicsoft, Inc. Subsequently, Cisco
Systems, Inc. acquired all or substantially all of dynamicsoft's assets.
I cannot speak on behalf of either organization regarding their position
on what rights, if any, they believe they retain in RFC 3265.
/Adam Roach
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
