> -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 24 October 2008 12:22 > To: Elwell, John; sipping@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Decision needed on final issue > withdraft-ietf-sipping-update-pai-07 > > The problem with the current words is that this document updates RFC > 3325, and therefore by implication any statement of scoping implies a > rescoping of RFC 3325. > > So you actually need to say that this document makes no change to any > existing or implied usage of identify in responses as defined by RFC > 3325 - [JRE] I like this suggestion. > or alternatively just don't include any mention of responses at > all. > > But personally I think we should solve the response issue by > identifying > conditions under which it can be valid - see other mail on > this subject. [JRE] I would like to, but we have to convince everyone concerned that we have a valid solution. John > _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
