Re: kernel-secnext aarch64 builds missing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 3:57 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 9:17 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for making it work again! The aarch64 secnext CI runs are
> > passing now. I'm not aware of any bug that could have caused the
> > issue, but it's Rawhide where unfortunately even nasty bugs might
> > sometimes appear.
>
> No problem, my apologies for taking so long to get back to it.  I
> should also mention, in the interest of being fair to Rawhide, in the
> several years that I've been doing the kernel-secnext builds for
> Rawhide, I think this is only the second (third?) time that Rawhide
> broke so badly that the systems wouldn't boot after an update.

There seems to be another issue with the aarch64 builds now: the
latest -rc3 RPMs are not present in the repo, even though they are
referenced in the repo metadata - see:
https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/d7a202c8-8acb-4153-bf01-553f22be2741/work-run-ci5ze4l6ha/tmt/plans/run-ci/execute/data/guest/default-0/tmt/tests/prepare-system-1/output.txt

Yesterday the same set of rpms installed successfully:
https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/6c7a539c-7616-46c4-a93b-d2a32cd109b4/work-run-cioxa3jpn4/tmt/plans/run-ci/execute/data/guest/default-0/tmt/tests/prepare-system-1/output.txt

--
Ondrej Mosnacek
Senior Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.






[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux