Re: kernel-secnext aarch64 builds missing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:28 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 4:17 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > It seems that aarch64 builds of the secnext kernel stopped appearing
> > in [1] some time ago (and kernel-secnext testing results for aarch64
> > stopped appearing as well). Were they intentionally stopped or is
> > there a problem that prevents them from being produced?
> >
> > The new Testing-Farm-based selinux-testsuite CI matrix includes
> > aarch64 + secnext kernel, so it is somewhat affected (until [2] it has
> > been quietly installing rawhide kernels instead and passing; now it
> > will fail when no secnext kernel is available). Any chance the aarch64
> > builds could be reinstated?
>
> [NOTE: adding the selinux list since it is somewhat related]
>
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> Yes, sadly for some reason Fedora Rawhide, which I use to build the
> kernel-secnext kernels, started panicking my aarch64 system *hard*
> after an update some time ago and I was forced to disable the
> kernel-secnext builds.  Unfortunately the issue appeared to be due to
> some userspace, or compiler change, that affected the entire system
> and once my build chroot was updated using dnf the entire chroot was
> bricked.  I saw similar problems on my aarch64 dev/test VMs.  I dug
> around on the RH bugzilla and didn't see any reports, nor anything
> obvious via google searches.  I was hoping to go back and try to debug
> and/or restore the chroot and VM but I haven't had the time.
>
> As a reference point, Fedora 41, Alama v9.5, and Ubuntu 24.04 are all
> working fine on my aarch64 system so I doubt there is some hardware
> issue.
>
> Are you aware of any nasty aarch64 problems in Rawhide, either now or
> starting back in October?

I'm still interested in hearing if anyone has any info on a
aarch64/Rawhide breakage in October as it may help me recover my VMs,
but I just now tried creating a minimal aarch64/Rawhide chroot (only
installed bash) and it seems to be working now (!).  I'm going to try
to rebuild a new Rawhide chroot that can build kernels and see how it
goes ... more info later.

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux