On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:51 AM James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:39 AM Petr Lautrbach <lautrbach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > it's been some time [1] since we released 3.5 so it's time to start with > > 3.6 > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/87v8auhbr6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#t > > > > Currently we have about 153 merged changes and about 39 changes waiting > > for review or to be merged. > > > > You can see waiting queue at > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/selinux/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=82149 > > > > # Series: > > > > ## [RFC,1/9] libselinux: annotate interfaces with compiler attributes > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/selinux/list/?series=747047&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate= > > > > Given that some patches were already rejected, I guess that the whole set could be considered as rejected as well. > > > > Yes. > > > ## [1/5] libsepol: free memory on str_read() failures > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/selinux/list/?series=765423&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate= > > > > Based on https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP+JOzQ-AuM9M3c4ehKYca-eUAOy0wbVGkygkpPkhhSTNaVC-Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I've marked them as "not applicable" > > > > Yes, nothing necessarily wrong with the patches, but they would need > to be updated and resubmitted. > > > ## libselinux: rework selabel_file(5) database > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/selinux/list/?series=775966&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate= > > > > Given that the majority was already accepted/merged, the rest could be considered as rejected. > > If there's no objection I'll mark them before the release. > > > > I am very hesitant about the selabel patches. I have never been > involved with the selablel code before and I am very worried about > potential ordering changes leading to labeling problems. > I would be ok with Christian updating them and resubmitting them after > this release. I am willing to review the code, but I really need some > other people to test them before I would be ready to merge them. > > > ## [1/5] libsepol: include length squared in hashtab_hash_eval() > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/selinux/list/?series=776635 > > > > no response yet > > > > I never saw this patch series. I got kicked off the mailing list at > one point and had to resubscribe. I went through the archives, but > must have missed this series. > I'll take a look at it. > I did take a look at it and it looks good. I tried my best to create a reply to the list, but I was unable to make any of the suggestions work. See: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230816123845.80171-1-cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ If someone could reply to the first email of the series and cc me, then I can add my ack. Unless someone has a better suggestion. Thanks, Jim > > ## CIL Cleanups and Improved Argument handling > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/selinux/list/?series=788225 > > > > There's Reviewed-by and Acked-by attached to the first patch but I guess that it applies to the whole serie. > > If it's not merged before the release and there's no other objection, I'll merge it. > > > > Sounds good to me. > > Thanks, > Jim > > > > > > > The rest are individual patches which are already acked or waiting for review. > > > > > > # Plan > > > > During this week, I'll prepare update of translations from fedora weblate and I'll prepare pre-release list of highlights for this release. > > > > I'd like to start with rc1 during next week and then do rc releases every other week (14 days) > > > > > > Please let me know if there's any objection or if you think that we should wait for somethig or if you want to have seomthing in release notes. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Petr > > > > > > > > > > > >
