On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:34 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:53 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/2/2021 10:20 AM, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > > Hi Casey, > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:40 PM Olga Kornievskaia > > > <olga.kornievskaia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> Add a new hook that takes an existing super block and a new mount > > >> with new options and determines if new options confict with an > > >> existing mount or not. > > >> > > >> A filesystem can use this new hook to determine if it can share > > >> the an existing superblock with a new superblock for the new mount. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Do you have any other thoughts on this patch? I'm also wondering how > > > you want to handle sending it upstream. > > > > James Morris is the maintainer for the security sub-system, > > so you'll want to send this through him. He will want you to > > have an ACK from Paul Moore, who is the SELinux maintainer. > > In the past I've pulled patches such as this (new LSM hook, with only > a SELinux implementation of the new hook) in via the selinux/next tree > after the other LSMs have ACK'd the new hook. This helps limit merge > problems with other SELinux changes and allows us (the SELinux folks) > to include it in the ongoing testing that we do during the -rcX > releases. > > So Anna, if you or anyone else on the NFS side of the house want to > add your ACKs/REVIEWs/etc. please do so as I don't like merging > patches that cross subsystem boundaries without having all the > associated ACKs. Casey, James, and other LSM folks please do the > same. Sure: Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> Are you also going to take patch 3/3 that uses the new hook, or should that go through the NFS tree? Patch 2/3 is a cleanup that can go through the NFS tree. Anna > > -- > paul moore > www.paul-moore.com
