On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:53 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3/2/2021 10:20 AM, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > Hi Casey, > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:40 PM Olga Kornievskaia > > <olga.kornievskaia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Add a new hook that takes an existing super block and a new mount > >> with new options and determines if new options confict with an > >> existing mount or not. > >> > >> A filesystem can use this new hook to determine if it can share > >> the an existing superblock with a new superblock for the new mount. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Do you have any other thoughts on this patch? I'm also wondering how > > you want to handle sending it upstream. > > James Morris is the maintainer for the security sub-system, > so you'll want to send this through him. He will want you to > have an ACK from Paul Moore, who is the SELinux maintainer. In the past I've pulled patches such as this (new LSM hook, with only a SELinux implementation of the new hook) in via the selinux/next tree after the other LSMs have ACK'd the new hook. This helps limit merge problems with other SELinux changes and allows us (the SELinux folks) to include it in the ongoing testing that we do during the -rcX releases. So Anna, if you or anyone else on the NFS side of the house want to add your ACKs/REVIEWs/etc. please do so as I don't like merging patches that cross subsystem boundaries without having all the associated ACKs. Casey, James, and other LSM folks please do the same. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
