On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:52 AM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yes, you really need to revert this patch David, I mentioned this some > > time ago when the linux-next conflict appeared. > > It is reverted. Thank you. [sorry, I forgot the reply-all] > > Also, future patches like this *really* need to go in via the SELinux tree, > > not the keys tree, as they affect the SELinux kernel ABI and if they aren't > > merged via the same tree lots of bad things can happen if we aren't careful. > > Are you're willing to take the matching keyring changes with it? The SELinux > patch won't build without them - but they have to go in at the same time > otherwise the keyrings part will malfunction. Assuming they've got the right ACKs from any subsystems that are affected, sure. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
