Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, you really need to revert this patch David, I mentioned this some > time ago when the linux-next conflict appeared. It is reverted. > Also, future patches like this *really* need to go in via the SELinux tree, > not the keys tree, as they affect the SELinux kernel ABI and if they aren't > merged via the same tree lots of bad things can happen if we aren't careful. Are you're willing to take the matching keyring changes with it? The SELinux patch won't build without them - but they have to go in at the same time otherwise the keyrings part will malfunction. David
