On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:58 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:32 AM Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Looks good to me and tests passed. I anticipate resolving conflicts
> > between this and the sidtab reverse lookup hash table being non-trivial
> > so it will probably require some review when/if Paul merges them both.
>
> I haven't yet looked at the latest revision of either patch, but the
> previous versions looked pretty good (my only comments were rather
> small, and for the most part everyone else seemed happy as well -
> minus the small fixes). After I send the merge window PRs off to
> Linus (tests are passing so that should be today) I'm going to give
> these a final look and start trying to smoosh them together; I'll
> probably create a new branch ("next-queue" or something similar) once
> I'm done where people can review the merge and point out where I
> messed things up ;)
FYI, now merged into selinux/next. Thanks everyone!
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
