On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:32 AM Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looks good to me and tests passed. I anticipate resolving conflicts
> between this and the sidtab reverse lookup hash table being non-trivial
> so it will probably require some review when/if Paul merges them both.
I haven't yet looked at the latest revision of either patch, but the
previous versions looked pretty good (my only comments were rather
small, and for the most part everyone else seemed happy as well -
minus the small fixes). After I send the merge window PRs off to
Linus (tests are passing so that should be today) I'm going to give
these a final look and start trying to smoosh them together; I'll
probably create a new branch ("next-queue" or something similar) once
I'm done where people can review the merge and point out where I
messed things up ;)
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
