Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:

> > Because it is not necessary.
> 
> The logic escapes me, but OK.

We should only extend the stacking infrastructure to what is concretely 
required. We don't yet have a use-case for stacking perf_event so we 
should keep the code as simple as possible. As soon as multiple LSMs 
determine they need to share the blob, we can convert the code to blob 
sharing.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux