Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:

> Please consider making the perf_alloc security blob maintained
> by the infrastructure rather than the individual modules. This
> will save it having to be changed later.

Is anyone planning on using this with full stacking?

If not, we don't need the extra code & complexity. Stacking should only 
cover what's concretely required by in-tree users.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux