On 6/6/2019 11:41 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:23:07PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> Maybe lsm_export_is_interesting()? >> I'd love to discover there's a convention I could adhere to. > I'd agree "lsm_data" seems meaningless. lsm_export does seem a better > name, though it has the "export is also a verb" issue. Would "lsm_context" > or "lsm_ctx"? > be better? > > then we get lsm_ctx_is_interesting() and lsm_ctx_to_secid() ? Fiddling around with this led me to think "struct lsmdata" would work, although maybe "struct lsmblob", in keeping with the notion it is opaque. Leaving out the "_" helps with the verb issue, I think. I think ctx or context is right out, as secctx is the string representation, and it would really confuse things.
