On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:23:07PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > Maybe lsm_export_is_interesting()? > I'd love to discover there's a convention I could adhere to. I'd agree "lsm_data" seems meaningless. lsm_export does seem a better name, though it has the "export is also a verb" issue. Would "lsm_context" or "lsm_ctx"? be better? then we get lsm_ctx_is_interesting() and lsm_ctx_to_secid() ? -- Kees Cook
